Home Sitemap All news Inside SL Opinions Finance News feeds Contact
RSS Feed For All Articles
 

button
Advertisement
"Luke Connell was tipped off," Druart says about bank ban 

User Rating: / 3

PoorBest 
Written by Xavier Mohr   
Monday, 14 January 2008

From lindsaydruart.blogspot.com:

Sunday, January 13, 2008
Why L&L Corporation Has Severed Ties with WSE

On December 20, 2007, I was alerted by Luke Connell Vandeverre over a conversation in Skype that 3 Midas depositors had hired Stevan Lieberman of Greenberg and Lieberman, LLC claiming damages from the World Stock Exchange in response to its default on bond payments causing the supposed bankrupt. While I thought the lawsuit a bit frivolous in a business sense as it would cost more to facilitate than the actual benefit, I advised Luke to do what he felt best but to do a bit of research on the claims that the lawyer was making. Luke replied to the lawyer with a statement that he was not liable, as expected, and copied several Linden Lab officials. This was an expected reaction and perfectly fine by my view at the time.

In the notice as well as conversations with Luke, it was clear that the banking industry of SL was not his favorite sector nor was JT Financial and SL Capital Exchange as this was the topic of discussion on many occasions. In addition, there were several attempts to purchase L&L Bank and Trust, one initiated by myself during the time in which that was an option and several subsequent inquiries made to me as well as Luke Birdbrain. I found it odd but continued to conduct a bit of logical explanation for possible reasoning. Considering WSE closed VERY shortly before the banking ban without any prior notice, I was puzzled as Luke had shared information about WSE happenings before but this time was different. Once the banking ban initiated, Luke Connell was quite elated to the fall of the SL banking industry which I found very odd. At that point, it all made sense. Luke Connell was tipped off. I speculate that Linden Labs received a subpoena for account information in relation to the Midas depositor’s case. Per Luke Connell, the lawyer planned to pursue the case whether there was a loosing chance or not to get the public eye on virtual business and create his name in the press for it.

Even though I felt he was lying to me about his knowledge of the ban, I decided to lay low and prepare to be in the right place at the right time. In a conversation with Luke Connell about WSE 4.0, he stated that directors and the new CEO would be voted on by the members of the exchange. I made a bit of a hint to me being nominated for a board position and he stated that he wanted to make sure the lawsuit did not affect WSE before reopening. In my mind, this meant that WSE may not reopen if the lawsuit gets ugly. Also, I received information that Luke was offering to buy banks in SL since the ban. Not to mention, WSE was giving away money for the holidays but had defaulted on bond payments. To my knowledge, no person can defer a payment on a loan without approval from the lien holder so WSE did not defer payments. WSE defaulted.

On January 11, 2008, Sarah Nerd asked a question in WSE Listing Chat and my window popped up. Normally, I would close the window because I usually don’t get involved in group chat but to no avail, I kept the window open and read as I was working on other things. A few things made my mouth drop.

[2008/01/11 18:51] LukeConnell Vandeverre: Latest news? he is getting ready to audit all user balances
[2008/01/11 18:51] LukeConnell Vandeverre: we know there are users with lindens or shares they shouldn't have and users with less than they should have so this is the first thing to be fixed

My question was….Who determines what users should and should not have? What accounts are being audited? Who is policing the police, so to speak? Since all directors were asked to resign, who else is privy to this information besides Luke Connell? I was appalled nonetheless because the only person with access to this information is him and it seems he is the sole decision maker on what accounts should have and what they shouldn’t. This is potentially fraudulent if I have ever seen fraud. I said nothing and continued to watch the conversation between Luke Connell and Rockwell Ginsberg.

[2008/01/11 19:17] Rockwell Ginsberg: OK, I apologize for the low blow regarding HCL. I know you are doing your best here. Do you worry about competition from other exchanges?
[2008/01/11 19:18] LukeConnell Vandeverre: not at all, does Mercedes ever worry about Hyundai
[2008/01/11 19:20] LukeConnell Vandeverre: what are the wse compeition? they are like playing with an Atari compared with an Xbox 360
[2008/01/11 19:22] Rockwell Ginsberg: They are open, you are not. Traders may leave and never come back. I am not familiar with these exchanges, but they may be able to attract some WSE business during the closure.

Rockwell made perfect sense while Luke was busy tooting his own horn without reason. The last and final straw of this conversation for me was this:

[2008/01/11 19:56] Rockwell Ginsberg: Listen Luke, I can say whatever the fuck I want to say, wherever the fuck I want to say it. And I am not trying to "serve my negative view." I have merely provided my opinion on these matters. You can do with this what you wish. But I've tried to provide constructive criticism here. If my honesty is difficult to take, I apologize.
[2008/01/11 19:57] LukeConnell Vandeverre: If you are making public statements that are negative towards the WSE and counter-productive towards the WSE's objectives then your business will be delisted
[2008/01/11 19:58] LukeConnell Vandeverre: You can share your concerns privately
[2008/01/11 19:58] LukeConnell Vandeverre: therefore having not negative impact on the WSE
[2008/01/11 19:58] Rockwell Ginsberg: Do you consider this forum to be a public one?
[2008/01/11 19:59] Rockwell Ginsberg: I do not.
[2008/01/11 19:59] LukeConnell Vandeverre: I consider the extent of your opposition towards WSE in this group to be of concern and a display of your anti WSE opinions which i'm sure you've been sharing in public forums according to others from what i'm told

For one, people have opinions and will not always agree. But for a man running a company to state that he will delist any company that does not agree is tyrannical and almost neo-nazi and this is not the place for L&L Rentals and Sales. Last time I checked, free enterprise and free speech reigned in SL and RL for the most part. Neither myself, nor my companies will have anything to do with such behavior. I have had my times with people but, I have never removed or left a business relationship over personal differences.

L&L Corporation and its subsidiaries have tremendous stake in the truth and in customer service. These are two things that are not available at the World Stock Exchange at the current moment. At one time, I saw the vision but now I see the lies. It is my speculation that Luke seeks to buy the closing banks below value to gain depositor lists in order to issue WTF shares to depositors rather than their money. In doing so, he would control a monopoly of the financial sector for pennies as he would issue a worthless stock for the hard earned money of SL residents and make a commission on their sales to try to get out. Double payday. This is why Midas refused to give up the depositor list. While Midas may have been overspent, WSE defaulted on its promise to the market and in turn bankrupted a company on it own issuance and not the company itself.

I must commend the stock exchanges that have a bit more respect for its investors than this. I have had my differences with Arbitrage and he and I know there are some things we don’t agree on but I have known him to be fair. We have decided to facilitate trading for L&L Rentals and Sales in house to not put any undo strain on the exchanges that are working through liquidity issues with regards to the banking ban. We will assist our own depositors and shareholders the best we can with our facilities at L&L Financial Services. Thank you all for your support of L&L Corporation and its companies and we wish all the honest businesses of SL the best of luck in the days ahead.

Sincerely,

Lindsay Druart, CEO
L&L Corporation

Stay tuned to SLReports.net for more information.

*** NOTICE: SL Reports cannot vouch for the validity of third-party statements contained or quoted within reposted material. For more information, please contact the original author. ***

Comments
Search RSS
Talwyn Mills  - If its just for educational pu   |2008-01-22 02:38:15
If its just for educational purposes, can I have a credit of, say, 1 million L$
on WSE so I can learn about stock trading? If Luke is so blithe with other
peoples money while its in his exchange, surly he can't have any problem giving
me his?
Ummmm... Okay   |2008-01-18 00:21:07
So rjs, if he's not a company, is he a friggin' school? He must be if you think
for one second that he was in it for "educational purposes", only. I
suppose that Luke is some sort of "teacher", then?

He can say
whatever the Hell he wants to try and spin the way his "company" is
looked at. I won't believe a word of what he says. His audio message is what is
complete trash.

If you want to think that the WSE was for "educational
purposes" only, go right ahead. I'm sure you probably don't have your money
locked up in his "school", like a lot of others do. I guess he learned
them, huh?
rjs  - What Trash   |2008-01-17 23:59:29
"But for a man running a company to state that he will delist
any company that does not agree is tyrannical and almost neo-nazi
and this is not the place for L&L Rentals and Sales."


WSE is not a company, and those behind it have an audio that
plainly states that it is for educational purposes only.
It's not a company, he is not a business man.. and you are
absurd for continuing your moronic writings.

--rjs
WSErocks   |2008-01-15 15:40:31
WSE 4.0 will be THE BEST, don`t care about the REST!
JT´s Ponzi-Based
Trading_Platform is NO competition!
Xavier Mohr   |2008-01-15 02:16:16
My honest opinion about Linden Lab is not all that damningly surprising. They
have followed the same path as dozens of corporations before them.

Linden Lab
is becoming too influenced by special interest. Banks, big-name writers, tech
corps, career sim-owners... like it or not, depending on affiliations, one
single person can have ten times the impact as the entire SL community if only
they have enough money and power.

Simply put, special interest means growth.
Linden Lab wants to become the next Apple or Microsoft, but I simply don't see
that happening.

I honestly think that 2008 and 2009 will see the plateau and
decline of Second Life, as other competitors emerge with better open sim
technology and self-governance... I think the final victor in the virtual world
industry will simply be some random programming company somewhere, that comes up
with a user-friendly sim server application and open-source viewer. In the end,
I think that Second Life will look extremely limiting and proprietary standing
next to its competitors' networks that operate more like the regular Internet.
SLReports.net User   |2008-01-15 01:59:08
Luke seems to suggest there that it's software fault some have more cash or
stocks they should, as some have less.

In that case, the developer is the
exact right person to audit for those. Developer is not the right person for
financial reasons auditing (insider trading for example), then again, WSE does
NOT audit for those.

WSE is a free roam exchange, where insider trading is
not in larger degree prohibited, i think its discouraged, but not really
investigated if that happens or not
Xavier Mohr   |2008-01-15 01:51:54
Xavier Mohr wrote:
*** NOTICE: SL Reports cannot vouch for the validity
of third-party statements contained or quoted
within reposted material. For more information,
please contact the original author. ***


As you can see, I made a very clear disclaimer here.

This
was actually a direct repost, and as for the title... it is
a quote directly from the text. Source is well cited. Not
sure what else you want, really.

Anything we do write
here that is an opinion is always labeled as such.

As I
said on many occasions, I encourage users to get news from
more than one source... that's just good judgment.
Strange Ranger   |2008-01-14 23:12:57
The "mouthpiece of some other company"? What exactly do you feel was
slanted in this report? It was reported exactly as it was presented, and there
is no added "fluff" to bias this in any way.
SLReports.net User   |2008-01-14 22:34:52
Can we have only unbiased reports on this site? Seriously, if this is going to
be the mouthpiece of some other company, then I'm going to stop coming here...
Ann Otoole   |2008-01-14 17:23:25
Since everything is speculation at this point...

How ironic it would be if,
during the due process of legal proceedings, it is revealed that Linden Research
was an accomplice to "bank failures" (by way of insider information
allowing certain people to "escape with the money") rendering LL liable
for damages. This is why real world law needs to be applied.

Again all i am
seeing is speculation that leads to drama. however if it turns out anyone was
"tipped off" then LL will pretty much owe all depositiers in all
financial enterprises every single L$ that was deposited. Of course there will
be a fight to the finish to avoid criminal prosecution. not exactly the type of
PR LL needs right now which may be related to the sudden unexplained increase in
positive media coverage that has begun including an "interview" propping
Anshe Chung up as a philanthropist.

yea right. its all about grabbing as
much cash as they can before the ship sinks.

let me know when the verifiable
facts are in. till then its all speculation and drama.
Only registered users can write comments!

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Last Updated ( Monday, 14 January 2008 )
 
Next >






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register